Tradition Nine "A.A., as such, ought never be organized; but
we may create service boards or committees directly
responsible to those they serve."
WHEN Tradition Nine was first written, it said that
"Alcoholics Anonymous needs that least possible organization." In years since
then, we have changed our minds about that. Today, we are able to say with
assurance that Alcoholics Anonymous--A.A. as a whole--should never be organized
at all. Then, in seeming contradiction, we proceed to create special service
boards and committees which in themselves are organized. How, then, can we have
an unorganized movement which can and does create a service organization for
itself? Scanning this puzzler, people say, "What do they mean, no organization?"
Well, let's see. Did anyone ever hear of a nation, a
church, a political party, even a benevolent association that had no membership
rules? Did anyone ever hear of a society which couldn't somehow discipline its
members and enforce obedience to necessary rules and regulations? Doesn't nearly
every society on earth give authority to some of its members to impose obedience
upon the rest and to punish or expel offenders? Therefore, every nation, in fact
every form of society, has to be a government administered by human beings.
Power to direct or govern is the essence of organization everywhere.
Yet Alcoholics Anonymous is an exception. It does not
conform to this pattern. Neither is General Service Conference, its Foundation
Board,* nor the humblest group committee can issue a single directive to an A.A.
member and make it stick, let alone mete out any punishment. We've tried it lots
of times, but utter failure is always the result. Groups have tried to expel
members, but the banished have come back to sit in the meeting place, saying
"This is life for us; you can't keep us out." Committees have instructed many an
A.A. to stop working on a chronic backslider, only to be told: "How I do my
Twelfth Step work is my business. Who are you to judge?" This doesn't mean an
A.A. won't take advice or suggestions from more experienced members, but he
surely won't take orders. Who is more unpopular than the old-time A.A., full of
wisdom, who moves to another area and tries to tell the group there how to run
its business? He and all like him who "view with alarm for the good of A.A."
meet the most stubborn resistance or, worse still, laughter.
You might think A.A.'s headquarters in New York would
be an exception. Surely, the people there would have to have some authority. But
long ago, trustees and staff members alike found they could do no more than make
suggestions, and very mild ones at that. They even had to coin a couple of
sentences which still go into half the letters they write: "Of course, you are
at perfect liberty to handle this matter any way you please. But the majority
experience in A.A. does seem to suggest . . . " Now, that attitude is far
removed from central government, isn't it? We recognize that alcoholics can't be
dictated to--individually or collectively.
At this juncture, we can hear a churchman exclaim,
"They are making disobedience a virtue!" He is joined by a psychiatrist who
says, "Defiant brats! They won't grow up and conform to social usage!" The man
in the street say, "I don't understand it. They must be nuts!" But all these
observers have overlooked something unique in Alcoholics Anonymous. Unless each
A.A. member follows to the best of his ability our suggested Twelve Steps to
recovery, he almost certainly signs his own death warrant. His drunkenness and
dissolution are not penalties inflicted by people in authority; they result from
his personal disobedience to spiritual principles.
The same stern threat applies to the group itself.
Unless there is approximate conformity to A.A.'s Twelve Traditions, the group,
too, can deteriorate and die. So we of A.A. do obey spiritual principles, first
because we must, and ultimately because we love the kind of life such obedience
brings. Great suffering and great love are A.A.'s disciplinarians; we need no
others.
It is clear now that we ought never to name boards to
govern us, but it is equally clear that we shall always need to authorize
workers to serve us. It is the difference between the spirit of vested authority
and the spirit of service, two concepts which are sometimes poles apart. It is
in this spirit of service that we elect the A.A. group's informal rotating
committee, the intergroup association for the area, and the General Service
Conferences of Alcoholics Anonymous for A.A. as a whole. Even our Foundation,
once an independent board, is today directly accountable to our Fellowship. Its
trustees are the caretakers and expediters of our world services.
Just as the aim of each A.A. member is personal
sobriety, the aim of our services is to bring sobriety within reach of all who
want it. If nobody does the group's chores, if the area's telephone rings
unanswered, if we do not reply to our mail, then A.A. as we know it would stop.
Our communications lines with those who need our help would be broken.
A.A. has to function, but at the same time it must
avoid those dangers of great wealth, prestige, and entrenched power which
necessarily tempt other societies. Though Tradition Nine at first sight seems to
deal with a purely practical matter, in its actual operation it discloses a
society without organization, animated only by the spirit of service--a true
fellowship. *In 1954, the name of the Alcoholic Foundation, Inc., was changed to
the General Service Board of Alcoholics Anonymous, Inc., and the Foundation
office is now the General Service Office.
|